A Rhetorical Analysis Paper Essay Example for Free

A Rhetorical Analysis Paper EssayDR. Michael Hawes gave an informative speech on Economics, politics, pipelines and the preference as well as Canada-US relations in an increasingly complex world. He used a PowerPoint to portray his ideas and talked about topics such(prenominal)(prenominal) as grow of Canadian foreign policy, the rising impact of the U.S, free trade and North American integration, and diversification. His speech wasnt that interesting to younger adults such as me because he talked a lot about politics save he was very funny keeping me entertained which is always a plus. He established a clear central thesis, although he s assistant this is my central thesis and established his main points. He transiti peerlessd into each point individually and took eon to explain each concept it took a long time but he didnt shy away from all the details.Dr. Michael Hawes speech was credible because he is a professor of political science, a tireless advocate of international education, and a proud alumnus of the fullbright program. He assumed the leadership of Fulbright Canada in phratry of 2001 and has had the privilege of directing the program through some very exciting times. He is Chief Executive Officer of the Foundation for Educational Exchange betwixt Canada and the United States of America, Executive Director of the Canada U.S. Fulbright Program, and Executive Director of the Killam Fellowships Program. Under his direction Fulbright Canada has witnessed dramatic growth in its programs and in the number of students and scholars that the program supports.DR. Michael Hawes appealed to the audience because he took his time to explain he concept he was public lecture about with full detail. He used statistics sparingly but with great effect because they were such interesting statistics. He was funny and made the audience laugh several times during his speech. He used a PowerPoint as a visual aid to we could clearly see the trends he was talking a bout and to see things visually which is always a plus. He appealed to me as a very funny but profession man who wasnt just some stiff figure who made me fall to sleep.His body got slightly dull during the end though aft(prenominal) the talk of politics and relations though. DR. Michael Hawes appealed to my emotions as well as the other audience members I believe because of his style. He didnt stand at the rostrum and talk he actually came down at one point and still talked to us. He gave real and true eye contact. He showed passion and vehemence for the topics he was talking about and answered peoples questions at the end he didnt understand one of the questions and you could tell but he still gave a pretty good answer to whatever he though the question was.In conclusion Dr. Michael Hawes I believe was a very good speaker one thing I didnt like though was the PowerPoint and how he had to look at it to explain some of the concepts because it cut his connection with the audience. I left life good about the speech I just saw though maybe just a little bit tired though because it was long. I did learn a lot though from his presentation which was really nice, I also wanted to read up more about what he was talking and learn more about the topics he talked about after I got back to my dorm.